AppReasons

  • ABOUT US
  • APOLOGETICS TOPICS
    • WHY APOLOGETICS
    • CAN I TRUST THE BIBLE?
    • THE RESURRECTION
    • THE GOSPEL
    • FAITH & DOUBT
    • EVIL & SUFFERING
    • EVOLUTION
  • RESOURCES
    • “THE LATEST”
    • DR. WL CRAIG VIDEOS
    • GRAVITY BOOK-HERE!
    • GREAT LINKS
    • INTERESTING TOPICS
  • OTHER
    • CONTACT AppReasons
    • LAND of Havilah

Evil & Suffering

THE PROBLEM OF EVIL AND SUFFERING, PART 1

The reality of evil and suffering confronts us on a daily basis; we read about it in the news and sometimes we experience it firsthand. This reality won’t go away, and many have found it to be a stumbling block to belief in a loving God.
There are two fundamental types of evil:
(1) Moral evil: evil attributed to human beings; and
(2) Natural evil: the problem of pain coming from the universe, for example tumors and tsunamis.
Likewise, there are two fundamental perspectives on evil:
(1) That of the sufferer; and
(2) That of the observer.
Someone who is suffering evil needs more than theological or philosophical answers; they need the comfort of friends and family – the ministry of presence. On the other hand the observer of suffering will often have many questions, for example:
  • Why must this person suffer?
  • Where was God when this tragedy happened?
  • Why doesn’t God stop the suffering?
How are we to deal with questions such as these? There are no easy answers, but we should understand that using evil as a reason to reject the existence of God turns out to be illogical. For without God we have no basis for characterizing something as either good or evil. This is expressed by Richard Dawkins, one of the leading New Atheists, who described the ethical implications of his naturalistic worldview as follows:
In a universe of blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt, other people are going to get lucky and you won’t find any rhyme or reason in it, nor any justice. The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at the bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good. Nothing but blind, pitiless indifference. DNA neither knows nor cares. DNA just is. And we dance to its music.[1]
It is significant that Dawkins wrote that there is “no evil and no good”, for this underscores the fact that a naturalistic worldview provides no basis for ethics or morality. However, we know intuitively that good and evil are real; a study of human cultures from around the world and through the ages shows that we share a sense of right and wrong. This speaks to a “law is written on (the) hearts”[2] of all people, as Paul wrote. We are moral beings, and this is powerful evidence of a just God who made us in His image.
Some may contend that the existence of evil is proof that a good and just God does not exist. While rejection of God may solve an ‘intellectual problem’ for them, it also removes any basis for hope. As Dawkins wrote, “there is, at the bottom, no design, no purpose…” ,surely a recipe for hopelessness.
The book of Job describes the suffering of a man who experienced both natural and moral evil on the same day: violent weather resulted in the death of all his children, as well as the death of his sheep and shepherds, while marauders stole the rest of his livestock and murdered his servants. He was subsequently afflicted with painful sores. The account makes it clear that God did not originate either the moral or natural evil that Job experienced. Rather, it was Satan who asked for and received permission to originate this evil for the purpose of testing Job’s faith in God.
This explanation, however, leads to several other questions, perhaps the most pressing being: Why did God create a universe that would allow evil? Surely He could have made beings incapable of evil. Of course, even we can do that – we call them robots! Wishing for beings incapable of evil is essentially wishing ourselves out of existence. God took the risk of creating beings with freedom of choice. This is similar to the risk that every parent takes when bringing a child into the world: the risk that their child would one day reject them. Aren’t we glad that our parents took that risk!
Although Job cried out to God for an explanation of his suffering, instead of receiving a direct answer, he was challenged to focus on God rather than on his problems. This gives us a clue that instead of asking “Why” when we see evil, we should take a different perspective: look at God’s power and justice and remember that He is sovereign. Once Job did this, he realized: “I know that you can do all things, and that no purpose of yours can be thwarted…I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you; therefore I despise myself, and repent in dust and ashes.”[3] Job recognized God’s sovereignty, and that through his suffering he had been drawn closer to Him.
We have a major advantage over Job: we can see God’s nature clearly in Jesus Christ. In the next Apologetic Minute we will look at what Jesus had to say about the problem of evil, and how we know that God cares deeply about human suffering.
Additional Resources:
Is God Good? (2-minute video, very good)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rfd_1UAjeIA
Walking with God through Pain & Suffering by Tim Keller
(10 copies of this excellent book are in the Lending Library)
Did God Create Evil?
http://is.gd/LkpHa9

 

[1] Richard Dawkins, River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life (New York: Basic Books, 1996), 133, quoted in John C. Lennox, Gunning for God: Why the New Atheists are Missing the Target (Oxford: Lion Hudson, 2011), 135.
[2] Romans 2:15 ESV
[3] Job 42:2, 5- 6 ESV

Filed Under: Apologetics 101, EVIL & SUFFERING

PROBLEM OF EVIL & SUFFERING – PART 2

This is the second of two articles on the problem of evil and suffering. In the first article we noted that there are two fundamental types of evil:

(1) Moral evil: evil attributed to human beings; and
(2) Natural evil: the problem of pain coming from the natural world.

The reality of evil causes some people to assert either that God does not exist, or that He does not care and therefore is not good. However, rejecting the existence of God leaves one with two unresolved problems: there is no ethical basis for defining “good” or “evil”; and there is no hope for dealing with evil.

So what does the Bible teach about this issue?

In the first article we drew some lessons from the book of Job, which describes the suffering of a man who experienced both natural and moral evil on the same day. In this article we will look at Jesus’ teaching on the subject. This is described in Luke 13:1-5, when He responded to two shocking incidents that had occurred in Jerusalem. Jesus’ response to each incident was to ask a question and then give an answer.

The first incident was moral evil: under Pilate’s authority some Galileans had been murdered and their blood mingled with their sacrifices. Jesus’ question was: “Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans, because they suffered in this way?”[1]

The second incident concerned 18 people killed by a collapsing tower, apparently innocent victims of an accident or earth tremor. His question concerning this was: “Do you think that they were worse offenders than all the others who lived in Jerusalem?”[2]

Jesus’ answer to both questions was: “No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.”[3]

Jesus’ questions seem to reflect the consensus of his listeners that these people suffered because of their sins. This principle of retribution is exactly what Job’s friends assumed about his suffering! God told Job’s friends that they were wrong[4], and Jesus said the same to his listeners.

Jesus’ answers are also similar to the answer given to Job. That is, instead of asking “Why?” when we see evil, we should take a different perspective. In Job’s case it was to look at God’s power and justice and remember that He is sovereign. Jesus taught that we should examine ourselves and be sure that sin does not stand between us and God.

Neither Job nor Jesus’ listeners get an answer to the question “Why?” However, we do get answers to some vital questions from the crucifixion, resurrection and promised return of Christ.

When we look at the cross, we see the answer to the question: “Does God care about suffering and injustice in the world”? The answer is a resounding “Yes”!

When we look at the empty tomb of Easter morning, we see the answer to another question: “Does God have the power to deal with evil and suffering”? The answer is, again, a resounding “Yes”!

When we remember Jesus’ promise to return in judgment[5] we know the answer to a third question: “Will there be justice one day”? The answer is a final and resounding “Yes”!

In the crucifixion God participated in our suffering. In the resurrection, He demonstrated victory over death. In Jesus’ return we are assured of justice, and know that this is a moral universe. Our conscience is not an illusion.

While unbelievers may scoff at the idea of judgment, it is important to point out that without the promise of judgment there can be no promise of justice. The common human sense of right and wrong calls out for justice when we see barbarous acts carried out on innocent victims, for instance the summary beheadings by ISIS of civilians or the abuse of children. If there is not judgment, there is no justice.

A Christian is not one who has solved the problem of suffering, but one who has come to trust God in our suffering.

[1] Luke 13:2 ESV

[2] Luke 13:4 ESV

[3] Luke 13:3 and Luke 13:5 ESV

[4] Job 42:7

[5] Matthew 25:31-46

Filed Under: Apologetics 101, EVIL & SUFFERING

SEARCH OUR ARTICLES

Copyright © 2022 App Reasons